Mulberry for Weight Loss: Not just unproven, but implausible

mulberry_zuccarin_INT_web1I don’t normally read the freebie newspapers in Toronto as their content is the journalistic equivalent of the lead in the Toronto water supply: both slowly sap your intellect away.

But I ride public transit and those papers are littered everywhere, rolling around the TTC. So against my better judgment I picked up the paper on May 20,  skipped past the article from the “holistic nutritionist” (a topic for another day) and stumbled across this advertisement:

“The Man Who Made the Whole Town Lose Weight”

Impressive headline.  Reading further it turns out that “Johnny Petterson”, a local health food store owner in Alesund, Norway, had started selling mulberry leaf tablets to his customers, and they lost weight – after only 10 days.  According to the advertising copy, Johnny has helped over 1500 customers lose weight. Apparently this product is for sale at major pharmacies in Canada. So it’s time to do a bit of digging into this scientific breakthrough unearthed by a health food store owner.

Here’s excerpts from the ad (here is a similar PDF) – and my comments.

“When blood sugar is stable, sugar cravings disappear” – This statement is contradicted by the American Heart Association, which summarizes the evidence as, “We don’t really know enough about all the factors that cause specific food cravings.”

“I studied the effects of mulberries on blood sugar, insulin and fat burning” - There is one very small trial that evaluated mulberry leaf extract on blood sugar levels and observed that it reduced the initial increase in blood sugar after eating sugar. There is one unblinded evaluation of an ingredient extracted from mulberry leaves (1-deoxynojirimycin)  that suggests it may slow the rise in blood sugar after a meal. But there is no data to demonstrate that mulberry has any influence on “fat burning” or, most importantly, weight. The Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database, the most credible and evidence-based summary of information on “natural” products, has almost no information on this item – because no evidence has been published that meets its strict quality requirements.

“Mulberry leaves lead to lower insulin secretion, which makes you able to burn stored fat better and also reduce fat storage from excess calories” -  The very preliminary evidence that exists does suggest that mulberry leaves may have some sort of biological effect. The active ingredient may be the chemical 1-deoxynojirimycin, which appears to be an alphi (α)-glucosidase inhibitor. It may act to blunt the spike in blood sugar after a meal, by interfering with carbohydrate absorption.  The prescription diabetes drug acarbose (Prandase/Glucobay) is also an α-glucosidase inhibitor, so this ingredient from mulberry may have a similar effect.

The terms “burn stored fat better” is clinically meaningless. There is no evidence that mulberry reduces fat storage.

“Taking mulberry leaves, my customers changed to a healthier diet without even noticing it” – Wait, didn’t he just say that the mulberry affects insulin secretion? How did diet come into the picture? If it’s affecting insulin levels, why is the diet changing? Based on the very preliminary research with mulberry leaves, all we can propose is that mulberry leaves might affect how quickly sugars are absorbed. There is no evidence that this will have any impact on dietary choices. Further, this has not been observed with prescription drugs with the same action.

“We now know from clinical studies how mulberry leaves regulate blood sugar levels.” Ummm, no we don’t. Where’s the randomized clinical trials in human subjects that demonstrate this product is safe and effective?

The website makes even more questionable claims:

“You will experience that you ar no longer as tempted by foods and especially sugar. You will more easily stay on a healthy diet. Gradually you will lose weight (especially abdominal) and any retained water.” Again, there is absolutely no published evidence that the product will do this. No references are provided.

“Mulberry leaves contain phytosterols, which are cholesterol-lowering agents. While most studies have been done on mulberry’s effect on blood sugar, the studies found that serum cholesterol levels  also dropped by about 12% on average.” Yet again, there is no persuasive evidence to demonstrate this is the case.  Another unsubstantiated, unreferenced claim.

“Mulberry is safe and natural. But do not use mulberry during pregnancy or when breastfeeding” There is zero published evidence that demonstrates short-term or long-term mulberry leaf consumption is safe. No research has been conducted to determine what its side effects are. Based on the very preliminary evidence noted above, mulberry could potentially be dangerous if consumed by diabetics. Most importantly, studies have been done with mulberry leaves, or isolated ingredients. There is no published information or research with Mulberry zuccarin to demonstrate that it has the same effects.

Bottom Line

This is an interesting product. Mulberry leaves do seem to have some sort of biological activity and may contain chemicals that could be useful in the treatment of diabetes. But to claim that this product is a diabetes treatment is premature. Not enough information is known about the risk, benefits, or even what an appropriate dose might be. Moreover, if it actually works, this supplement could put diabetics at risk of low blood sugar (hypoglycemia).  So instead, the product is marketed as a weight loss support supplement – a completely unsubstantiated claim. There is no published to demonstrate that mulberry will help with short-term or long-term weight loss.

If  Mulberry Zuccarin was considered a drug product, there is zero likelihood it would be currently permitted for sale in Canada, the US, or any other jurisdiction.  Why? Because with drugs, conclusive evidence of efficacy and safety is required before sale is allowed.  But call it a natural health product, and all the barrier to sale disappear. It seems any manufacturer can take a unevaluated product, make unsubstantiated health claims, provide no  direct evidence of safety or efficacy, and yet secure shelf space in pharmacies.  As for Canadians,  Heath Canada’s Natural Health Products Directorate is missing in action (again) – failing to regulate health products, and failing to protect the health and safety of Canadians.

This product is available at all major Canadian pharmacies:  Shoppers Drug Mart, Rexall, Pharmaplus, Loblaws, and more. It’s a discouraging example of what appears to be an “anything for a buck” mentality we’re seeing more and more of when it comes to products for sale “in front of the counter”.

If you care about your health, and want evidence of efficacy and safety before you take a supplement for weight loss or diabetes, stay away from Mulberry Zuccarin.

Reference:

Mudra, M., Ercan-Fang, N., Zhong, L., Furne, J., & Levitt, M. (2007). Influence of Mulberry Leaf Extract on the Blood Glucose and Breath Hydrogen Response to Ingestion of 75 g Sucrose by Type 2 Diabetic and Control Subjects Diabetes Care, 30 (5), 1272-1274 DOI: 10.2337/dc06-2120

Another mulberry-based health product was discussed by David Bradley on his excellent blog, Sciencebase.

8 Responses to “Mulberry for Weight Loss: Not just unproven, but implausible”

  1. David Bradley Says:

    Thanks for the shout out. I am not against “herbal” and “natural” remedies, per se, indeed around 30-40% of modern pharmaceutical drugs have herbal origins. What I am against are the outlandish marketing claims for many of these products including mulberry, various teas, Rhodiola rosea, indium(!) etc etc.

    There is no valid testing of these products and yet the the companies that sell them often list dozens of ailments that they can supposedly cure. Whereas a truly effective pharma product gets lambasted because it has some spurious side-effect in a small population of users. Never mentioned are the potentially lethal side-effects of “herbal” remedies.

    Thanks for lending support to the sciencebase approach ;-)

  2. Lois Robertson Says:

    Have you read these articles on Mulberry leaf research? I have nothing to do with Zuccarin, but I found these articles interesting.

    http://www.ijddc.com/article.asp?issn=0973-3930;year=2001;volume=21;issue=3;spage=147;epage=151;aulast=Andallu

    http://www.life-enhancement.com/article_template.asp?ID=992
    This one has a reference list of articles at the end.

    • Scott Says:

      Thanks for your interest. Neither article, nor the references, provides persuasive evidence to support the outlandish claims made about the product.

  3. anthony Says:

    I do agree that certain natural products over-claim for the quality of their products and that may be harmful for the intakers. But, we cannot boycott a natural products willingly just because they had not been proved by specific governments specialists. There are endless natural methods that cure ailments without scientific proofs. They have existed from ages, wisdom of the past passed throughout time. For poorer people who cannot afford expensive described drugs & costs of doctor’s visits, do allow them the rights to search for theses less expensive means. Everyone needs to be cured, not just those who have money. In medicines, curing others’ ailments: charity comes first.
    I may be touch on the wrong aspect, but this is my aspect somehow on a related matter. I have found and read of certain natural methods that cure grave ailments and i believe scientists will be reluctant to approve them right away. The process costs, and takes time, and it would be devastating other products that are already on the shelves.
    Let the poor take a chance rather dying without a cure. But do so with care: they do have to know the intention of the producer. Products on the shelves without approval is a ‘watch-out’. But it’s no-doubt that there are some truth about their products, they do work.
    My comment

  4. jp Says:

    @anthony

    One box of 60 tablets of Mulberry costs 34,99 in the pharmacy where I work. This box lasts 20 days since you have to take 3 tablets before each meal. Moreover it is not covered by any healthcare plan.

    The medication acarbose (Glucobay) costs 24,99$ for 20 days and is covered by almost any healthcare insurances.

    Based on this fact, I do not agree with you that prescribed medication are for people who have money.

    A lot of natural products might work, but the companies who sells them make also a lot of profit, as well as any other pharmaceutical companies.

  5. Caro Says:

    Surprisingly, there actually IS a Johnny Pettersen in Ålesund, and he actually owns a health foods store. I cannot find anything in Norwegian about the supposed weight loss claims, though. Given how Ålesund only has about 40 000 inhabitants, the number of weight-losing people is absolutely ridiculous, though. The picture actually shows genuine Norwegian products, but it does look too touched-up, and the products on the shelf behind me puzzle me: Health food stores here rarely carry that much paracetamol (if they carry it at all) and certainly not more than one brand. But I am mostly just amazed that they didn’t make up the guy :P

  6. Emily Says:

    What ever chemicals are in the white mullberry leaves are fine by me. Having taken every type of topical pain relievers including DMSO over several years, I find that I had woken up for the first time without pain after taking two tablets of the mulberry zuccarin. Maybe there is something in using God’s gifts of the land. More research is obviously needed, but for now I am all for the white mulberry.

  7. Barb Says:

    Hey guys
    Sounds like Sour Grapes to me.
    Natural Factors has been selling Mulberry for fiber and Blocking sugar for years here in the US. It is sold under the name of WellBetX PGX.

Leave a Reply